Archbishop Ordered In – Rome Won’t Save Him

Judge with gavel striking sound block
Photo: Nuttapong punna / Shutterstock

A federal judge told the St. Louis archbishop that a Rome trip does not excuse him from a court-ordered mediation, and he must attend.

Story Snapshot

  • A federal order requires Archbishop Mitchell Rozanski to attend mediation in his lawsuit.
  • The judge rejected a request to skip because of an ad limina visit in Rome.
  • The court offered clear options: reschedule or appear by secure video.
  • The case is on a public federal docket, allowing easy verification.

Judge Says: Mediation Rules Apply to Everyone

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri ordered Archbishop Mitchell Rozanski to attend mediation in a case where he is a named plaintiff. The order says the court reviewed the filings and found mediation appropriate. The court cited a local rule that requires all named parties to attend, take part in good faith, and have settlement authority, unless officially excused. The judge stated, “The Court finds that he should be so required.”

The court addressed the archbishop’s claim that a scheduled ad limina visit to Rome conflicted with the set mediation date of November 23. The order quotes the Rome visit reason and then rejects it as not sufficient to skip attendance. The judge noted the parties themselves selected that date. The court stressed party participation is a basic requirement in such mediations when settlement choices may turn on the person’s authority and role.

Accommodations Offered: Reschedule or Join by Video

The judge did not demand an impossible choice between faith duties and the law. The order offered two concrete paths: pick a different date if November 23 truly does not work, or attend by secure videoconference under the district’s rules. That approach preserves the duty to show up while making room for travel demands. Many court mediation programs allow video attendance when the rules, the neutral, and the court agree it serves the process.

The court’s approach mirrors common federal mediation practice. Courts often require the real decision-maker or someone with meaningful settlement authority to be present. Mediation can stall if only lawyers attend but cannot approve a deal. Video conferencing bridges that gap without delaying justice. It keeps pressure on both sides to talk seriously, while cutting travel burdens and costs. The order sets that balance plainly and directly for both parties.

The Rome Argument: What It Is and What It Is Not

The archbishop argued that his ad limina visit, a scheduled series of meetings in Rome for bishops, conflicted with the date. Catholic sources describe ad limina visits as official pilgrimages that include meetings with Vatican offices and a final meeting with the pope. The court recognized the trip but said it does not erase a federal order to attend mediation, especially with video and rescheduling available. The ruling keeps religious life and civil duty in proper lanes.

The record available here does not include the full text of the local rule or the archbishop’s full schedule details. It also does not show what happened next, like whether he attended by video, got a new date, or faced any sanction. Those limits do not change the core fact: the judge required attendance and rejected the skip request tied to Rome. Anyone can check the case docket and the signed order to confirm the plain terms.

Why This Matters to Equal Justice and Common Sense

The message is simple: rules apply equally, whether you are a church leader, a corporation, or a government office. Courts expect the people with real authority to show up, work in good faith, and try to resolve disputes. That protects everyday Americans from delay games and special passes. Remote options and rescheduling show respect for real conflicts, while still holding the line on duty. This is how the system should work—firm, fair, and focused.

Sources:

redstate.com, storage.courtlistener.com, stlouisreview.com, bishop-accountability.org