
President Donald Trump’s latest financial disclosure shows a massive crypto haul that is already fueling fresh criticism over presidential profit and public trust.
Quick Take
- Trump’s 2025 disclosure reported at least $1.4 billion in crypto-linked income.
- Leslie Marshall said the figure shows “how tone deaf” Trump is to ordinary Americans.
- World Liberty Financial and the $TRUMP meme coin were the biggest drivers of the windfall.
- Trump’s team says the assets are managed by outside funds, not by him personally.
What the disclosure says
The disclosure released by the Office of Government Ethics shows Trump earned more than $1.4 billion from crypto and memecoin ventures in 2025. ABC News reported that $636 million came through CIC Digital LLC and $TRUMP coin licensing, while another $526 million came from World Liberty Financial token sales. Washington Post reporting also said the filing listed $635 million tied to a license agreement and additional income from World Liberty Financial and a stablecoin transaction.
The scale matters because the crypto money appears to be the largest slice of Trump’s business income last year. That is why the disclosure landed as more than a routine paperwork filing. For many conservatives, the bigger issue is not whether Trump is allowed to make money. It is whether a sitting president should be tied so closely to ventures that can benefit from his name, his office, and his policy power.
Leslie Marshall’s attack on Trump
During Fox News’ Special Report, Leslie Marshall argued that the numbers prove Trump is “tone deaf” to the American people. She said voters look at the disclosure and see a president profiting while in office, then conclude, “That is not what I elected him to do.” Her comments made the conflict-of-interest debate easy to understand, even if critics may question her tone or motive.
Marshall’s point rests on a simple idea: many Americans expect presidents to avoid looking like they are cashing in on power. That concern is not new. The difference here is the size of the crypto windfall and the way it overlaps with Trump’s family business network. World Liberty Financial was founded with Trump’s sons and associates, which keeps the family angle front and center.
Trump’s defense and the counterargument
Trump’s camp says the assets are held in outside funds and that he does not personally manage them. That response matters, because it is the strongest factual counterpoint in the record. The disclosure itself does not prove direct day-to-day control by Trump, and it does not show he personally ran each transaction. Still, the filing also does not erase the public optics of a president’s family-linked crypto ventures producing billion-dollar gains.
@SpecialReport @BretBaier @POTUS
Gosh, what a surprise, Temu Tarlov (Leslie Marshall) has a bitter opinion about Trump making money, THROUGH HIS TRUST CONTROLLED BY A THIRD PARTY. It’s almost as if FOX doesn’t want viewers.— Zack Lawton (@zackster_918) July 2, 2026
That is where the political fight will stay. Supporters will say the income was reported, legal, and handled through formal structures. Critics will say the numbers are so large that the public cannot ignore the appearance of influence, especially when the president’s own family is tied to the businesses. The result is a familiar Washington clash, but one with a new twist: digital assets, memecoins, and presidential power now sit in the same story.
Why it matters to voters
For readers who already distrust big government and elite double standards, the disclosure will likely feel familiar. It shows a president with enormous personal wealth, deep family business links, and a booming crypto portfolio at the center of public debate. Even so, the hard fact remains that the filing reported the income openly, which gives Trump allies a ready answer to charges of secret self-dealing.
The larger question is whether Americans want presidents who seem insulated from the rules ordinary people live by. Marshall’s criticism turns that question into a blunt judgment about character and judgment. The disclosure gives her attack real numbers to lean on, but it also gives Trump a defense built on formal compliance and outside management. Both sides now have the filing, and both sides will use it hard.
Sources:
mediaite.com, aol.com, yahoo.com













